Summary
This brief introduces the case registry dataset as a curated evidence base for real-world AI education practices, including implementation settings, learner audiences, evidence fields, and source trace.
Key evidence signals
- Case records help researchers study implementation patterns across K-12, higher education, community, workforce, and informal learning contexts.
- The dataset is strongest for descriptive registry analysis and evidence mapping; impact claims require record-level source review.
- Case completeness, source quality, and publication status should be considered when selecting records for synthesis.
Dataset source and citation
This AAB brief links to the dataset record hosted on IEEE Dataport. The publication host is named in text rather than represented with IEEE marks or logos.
AI Assessment Board. (2026). AI Education Case Registry Dataset. IEEE Dataport. https://doi.org/10.21227/z095-8k08
Recommendations
- Use case records to identify practice patterns, recurring implementation constraints, and evidence gaps.
- Preserve case IDs, source links, setting fields, and evidence notes in downstream analysis.
- Do not treat registry inclusion as AAB endorsement of a tool, provider, or instructional approach.
